AI and agentic systems for cyber-physical control
When an AI system can move something physical, what keeps it inside the envelope?
Machine learning is now embedded in decisions that open breakers, route traffic, and provision networks. Accuracy on a benchmark says little about behavior during an attack, a sensor fault, or a distribution shift. The center works on models that respect the physics of the system they control and on enforcement that sits between a model's output and the actuator.
What the group builds
Learning-based intrusion and anomaly detection
Scalable, real-time detection of attacks on grid control traffic, including adaptive transfer learning so a detector trained on one network still works on the next.
Federated learning across operators
Utilities cannot share raw operational data. Federated training lets detection models improve across sites while the measurements stay home, and the group measures what that costs in accuracy.
Physics-grounded models
A model that ignores power flow or optical impairment will confidently propose something impossible. The group grounds learned models in the physical constraints of the system.
Safety enforcement for agentic systems
As AI agents take actions rather than make predictions, the question becomes what the agent is permitted to do. The group works on enforcement layers that check actions against safety properties before they reach infrastructure.
Recent papers
The newest work from the faculty on this thrust. 72 papers since 2019 carry one of their names.
- A. Rezaee, F. Arpanaei, R. McCann, H. Rabbani, J. A. Hernández, M. Brandt-Pearce, V. M. VokkaraneIEEE/Optica Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 18, no. 10, Oct. 2026IF 4.0 (2023)
- C. Pozzi, C. Ng, S. Lyon, Y. Luo, C. Niezrecki, M. InalpolatWind Energy, vol. 29, no. 10, Sept. 2026IF 4.1 (2023)
- A. Rezaee, R. McCann, V. M. VokkaraneIEEE/Optica Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. D90-D105, Sept. 2026 (Special Issue on Benchmarking in Optical Networks)IF 4.0 (2023)
- A. Rezaee, F. Arpanaei, R. McCann, L. Nadal, J. A. Hernández, V. M. VokkaraneIEEE/Optica Journal of Optical Communications and Networking, vol. 18, no. 8, pp. C160-C172, Aug. 2026IF 4.0 (2023)
- T. Miskell, Y. Luo, P. Li, S. W. Lim35th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN), pp. 1-6, July 2026
- H. Rabbani, A. Rezaee, H. Rabbani, V. M. Vokkarane, M. Brandt-PearceIEEE International Conference on High Performance Switching and Routing (HPSR), pp. 1-5, June 2026
- M. Z. Islam, Y. Lin, V. M. VokkaraneIEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 3459-3471, Mar. 2026IF 4.2 (2023)
- S. Lyon, C. A. Ng, C. Pozzi, M. Inalpolat, C. Niezrecki, Y. LuoIEEE Sensors Journal, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 5195-5203, Feb. 2026IF 4.3 (2023)
Other thrusts
Most projects cut across two or three of them.